Besides the evil monks, the demonic Dalai Lama, and the lopsided reporting from the foreign media, the chairman of IOC, Jacques Rogge, is finally admitting that the game is indeed political after many other experts and NGOs have made their voices heard.
One of which entertained me the most (
Guardian):
"Much nonsense is uttered about the Olympics not being political. Anything rooted in blatant nationalism is political. Anything so expensive as to impose a multibillion-pound opportunity cost on the host nation is political. Anything "awarded" as a prize to authoritarian states like the Soviet Union or China is political." --- Simon Jenkins
Even though it seems like such an obvious answer that the Olympics is indeed very political, I was happy to find out that someone has conveyed it into coherent phrases.
A lopsided reporting is another bewildering accusation of this incident.
A few weeks ago, James Miles, the only foreign correspondent during the rising of the riot reported on this account several times after his return, including the BBC From Our Own Correspondent, a weekly radio programme. Miles concurred that the riot was started by the Tibetans and targeted on the Han Chinese businesses. Yes, they looted stores, though injuries were yet to be seen. Yes, they targeted the Han Chinese, though violence was yet to be confirmed.
For those who have heard his reporting, might conclude that the Tibetans portrayed by the foreign media are indeed like peaceful angels, whereas the Chinese government the abrasive oppressor. Well, the Chinese did come in with tanks and soldiers, as for whether did any monks got injured or killed, we might never know. Nevertheless, like Miles said, "The policies that the Chinese government have on Tibet have failed."
So after all this time, after many comments of those bystanders, I'd really like to hear what the people in Lhasa have to say on this account and the whole rioting. To my surprise, this
report from the Toronto Star, explained that the Han Chinese in Tibet seem to be quite pro Tibetans. And it seems like they want the same things --- economic growth.
At the end of the day, the basic needs of survival is what people of all races would fight for, though in the case of Tibet, the freedom to practice their religion would be just as crucial.